README.md Sample Rails 4.1.x application for by Aaron Sumner. This repository demonstrates incremental testing of an existing application, starting with an untested codebase and working through model, controller, and feature specs. Each chapter's progress has a specific branch in this repository.

See chapter 1 of the book for details. Using Git, you can check out each version by name. See details in the book.

If you're not comfortable with Git, you can also use GitHub's handy branch/tag filter to select a specific tag and browse the source code online. To learn more about Git, I recommend the free resources.

Rspec_rails_4 - Everyday Rails Testing with RSpec (Rails 4.0 Edition). YARD already has a handful of really great extensions, and that number is growing every day. YARD has tools to check your documentation quality (and coverage), run inline RSpec tests, test your documentation example code, add 'git blame' support to your source listings, graphs to your documentation, even one to. Everyday rails testing with rspec pdf free download, everyday rails testing with rspec pdf free download, reviews, read online, isbn:, by aaron sumner. Posted by Download Ebooks on 6:08 AM with No comments. Everyday Rails Testing with RSpec by Aaron Sumner English 2014-12-20 ISBN: N/A 194 Pages EPUB/MOBI/PDF (True) 2.5 MB. Have you gotten your hands dirty with a Rails application or two, but lack.

Finished checking it out. Definitely a faster paced screencast, but throughout I've identified things that I can read up on and do further study with later. I love how you covered both ui testing and actual functionality (making sure the email is actually sent, not just that the email link does something visually) Luckily I've used RSpec and Capybara before, so I was able to follow along decently enough, but at least some experience with both is probably a pre-requisite to keeping up. Overall, loved the screencast and would love to see more. Thanks as always, Ryan! Thank you very much for another great screencast! I agree that doing complex testing in each episode would be an overkill, but an episode dedicated to testing only from time to time is a really great idea and will encourage not-so-experienced developers like myself that testing really is the way to go.

Also you could at some point return to the idea of walkthrough screencasts like the ones you did around the release of 3.0. I personally also considered them a great help and they made me a better coder. Thank you very much again and keep up the amazing work! Microsoft Excel 2010 Tutorial Video Free Download here. Great screencast!

Having been passionate about testing, yet being totally self taught, it is great to see the similarities and differences in our testing process. One thing I am curious about is: What do you think about the approach of having only one assertion per test? I have read quite often that people take this approach in TDD, but it seems like, at least when writing request specs, the responses from a failing test make it very clear which assertion failed. Perhaps this is better practice in model specs?

This is really refreshing to see. I think seeing TDD in real action like this may do a lot to help its adoption. I've long felt that there's been a bit of a hypocrisy particularly in the Ruby community that we have it hammered into our heads that we should be doing TDD or BDD or what have you, but are barely at all shown how.

I see TDD as adopting the philosophy that writing tests/specs/etc is an integral part of one's development process, not some special separate step -- and yet, all the literature (books, blogs, screencasts) illustrates development without the testing, unless the testing tools are themselves the subject matter, and then you kind of see it in isolation. Even this episode, you've titled it 'How I Test' rather than just, 'How I Develop.' If TDD should be the default way of working, we should treat it that way rather than always talking about it as some special thing. I've been slow to adopt TDD practices, not because I need any more convincing of their benefit, but because I feel like I don't have a real understanding how it should be done (and even moreso in Rails development, where there's a lot of support infrastructure that needs setting up to spin up the app's environment, test database, fixtures, mocking out authentication, etc, before you can even get started running the tests!) and that frustrates me. I feel guilty every day that goes by that I don't do the right thing. Nba 2k14 Li Ning Shoes Patch on this page.